![]() School districts with mostly students of color receive $23 billion less in funding than their predominantly white counterparts, or $2,226 less for every student enrolled. But, state and local policymakers retained an outsized role in the provision of money to schools, and most never chose to support the success of schools in communities of color.įast forward to today, and the consequences are laid bare. It was an unprecedented action, and set a new standard for a federal role in school funding practices. The goal was to back-fill state coffers and provide resources to close gaps between poor and wealthy schools. Johnson signed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act into law, taking a groundbreaking step to correct for the unfair local school funding practices that precipitated the Brown case. ![]() Ten years after Brown, and at the height of the civil rights movement, President Lyndon B. As a Black woman, education advocate and former teacher, I don't think Brown's promise-improved life conditions for all-will ever materialize until communities, policymakers and school practitioners focus more on helping youth of color generate wealth than increasing the aggregate test scores in a school building. ![]() ![]() Massive racial disparities in educational outcomes remain a shameful consequence of ongoing school segregation because youth of color are relegated to failing schools. But, 68 years later, the progress the case was supposed to spur is little more than an unfulfilled dream. Board of Education was a remarkable victory in the American movement for racial justice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |